Apr12

Voice of Experience: IBM Cloud’s Compose for JanusGraph Uncovers Advantages of Scylla

Subscribe to Our Blog

ibm

IBM had previously used only Apache Cassandra and HBase as storage back-ends for the graph databases it makes available on IBM Cloud. Having heard about the advantages of Scylla, IBM’s Open Tech and Performance teams conducted a series of tests to compare Scylla with HBase and Apache Cassandra.

The IBM team learned quite a lot from their performance tests. In their first test, which generated a load of 40,000,000 vertices with two properties, Scylla displayed nearly 35% higher throughput than HBase and almost 3X Cassandra’s throughput. In their second test, which consisted of randomly picking 30,000,000 pairs of vertices and entering 30,000,000 edges into it with one property, Scylla’s throughput was 160% better than HBase and more than 4X that of Cassandra.

In addition to its performance advantages, Scylla was also the easiest database to cluster, especially when adding multiple nodes to a cluster. The IBM Compose team was very pleased to see Scylla’s self-tuning capabilities, load balancing, and its ability to fully utilize the available system resources.

Hear what IBM’s teams have to say about their experiences with Scylla in this video.

 

Next Steps

  • Learn more about Scylla on our product page.
  • See what our users are saying about Scylla.
  • Download Scylla. Check out our download page to run Scylla on AWS, install it locally in a Virtual Machine, or run it in Docker.
  • Take Scylla for a Test drive. Our Test Drive lets you quickly spin-up a running cluster of Scylla so you can see for yourself how it performs.

Phillip TribbleAbout Phillip Tribble

I am a Technical Marketing Manager here at ScyllaDB. I have spent a lot of time working in the storage and container ecosystem and am passionate about Linux, cloud technologies, and Node.js.


Tags: casestudy, compose, IBM, JanusGraph, performance