fbpx

ScyllaDB Summit 2023 Sessions Available On-Demand. Access Now

ScyllaDB Benchmarks

NoSQL Database Benchmarks

Selecting the best NoSQL database for your application is a business-critical task. That’s why we constantly compare ScyllaDB vs. other NoSQL databases for throughput and latency. Database latency determines your application speed, while database throughput defines how many users your application can service.

  • VS
Database Benchmark

4-node Scylla 2.2 (i3.metal) vs 40-node Cassandra 3.11 (i3.4xlarge)

  • Cassandra 4.0 has better P99 latency than Cassandra 3.11
  • ScyllaDB has 2x-5x better throughput and much better latencies than Cassandra 4.0
  • ScyllaDB adds and replaces nodes far faster than Cassandra 4.0
  • ScyllaDB finishes compaction 32x faster than Cassandra 4.0
See the full Report
See the full Report
  • VS
Database Benchmark

ScyllaDB vs DynamoDB – Database Benchmark

  • 20x better throughput in the hot-partition test
  • ScyllaDB Cloud is 1/7 the expense of DynamoDB when running equivalent workloads
  • ScyllaDB Cloud: Average replication latency of 82ms. DynamoDB: Average latency of 370ms.
  • ScyllaDB provides you freedom of choice with no cloud vendor lock-in
  • VS
Database Benchmark

ScyllaDB vs Bigtable – Database Benchmark

  • ScyllaDB Cloud performs 26X better than Google Cloud Bigtable when applied with real-world, unoptimized data distribution
  • Google BigTable requires 10X as many nodes to accept the same workload as ScyllaDB Cloud
  • ScyllaDB Cloud was able to sustain 26x the throughput, and with read latencies 1/800th and write latencies less than 1/100th of Cloud Bigtable
See the full Report
See the full Report
  • VS
Database Benchmark

ScyllaDB vs CockroachDB – Database Benchmark

  • Loading 10x the data into ScyllaDB took less than half the time it took for CockroachDB to load the much lesser dataset.
  • ScyllaDB handled 10x the amount of data.
  • ScyllaDB achieved 9.3x the throughput of CockroachDB at 1/4th the latency.
  • VS
Database Benchmark

Scylla vs Aerospike

  • Comparison from the code base on up, and why ScyllaDB’s underlying architecture is fundamentally designed for better scalability and performance
  • Differences in data models, query languages, and storage
  • How ScyllaDB and Aerospike compare for global deployment, consistency and consensus algorithms
  • A head-to-head performance comparison with a petabyte-scale workload, showing how ScyllaDB can provide up to 40% greater throughput on the same scale cluster
See the full Report

1:1 Office Hours

Schedule a technical consultation with a ScyllaDB Solution Architect.

Get Started

ScyllaDB University

Get started on the path to ScyllaDB expertise

Level up Your Skills

ScyllaDB Cloud

It’s easy to get started with our NoSQL DBaaS

Start Free

Product

Resources

ScyllaDB

Keep in Touch

[email protected] | contact us

Get Started
ScyllaDB Cloud
Github
 
2023 ©ScyllaDB | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | ScyllaDB, ScyllaDB, and ScyllaDB Cloud, are registered trademarks of ScyllaDB, Inc.

Apache® and Apache Cassandra® are either registered trademarks or trademarks of the Apache Software Foundation in the United States and/or other countries. Amazon DynamoDB® and Dynamo Accelerator® are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. No endorsements by The Apache Software Foundation or Amazon.com, Inc. are implied by the use of these marks.